Skip to main content

The Scholar and the Sledgehammer: How the Architect of Project 2025 Traded Black History for Political Overhaul

//
Opinion
Image
Sign saying Project 2025 kills democracy

In the halls of academia, there was once a historian named Kevin Roberts. Long before he became the President of the Heritage Foundation, Roberts spent years submerged in the archives of American history. He wrote his doctoral dissertation on the evolution of slavery in Louisiana and a master’s thesis on West African family structures. He was a man who once deeply researched the "DNA of resilience"—the same resilience we trace in our own family lineages. ​

But today, that same scholar has traded the historian’s pen for a political sledgehammer. As the chief architect of Project 2025, Roberts is no longer documenting history; he is attempting to rewrite the future of the American republic. ​As we look at this 900-page blueprint, we have to stop and ask ourselves: How did America get here? ​

The Great Paradox ​

It is a profound and chilling irony. I speak from a place of direct academic knowledge on this subject; I took those classes, and my minor was African-American History. Having studied this field at both Youngstown State University and Mesa Community College, I understand the weight of the narratives Roberts once researched. ​It is jarring to see a man who built his credentials studying the humanity of enslaved Black people now lead a movement to dismantle the institutional guardrails that protect marginalized communities. 

Project 2025 is not just a list of ideas; it is a mechanical overhaul designed to: 

​Centralize Executive Power: Shifting absolute control to the White House under the "Unitary Executive Theory." 

​Overhaul the Civil Service: Reclassifying thousands of non-partisan workers as political appointees (Schedule F), making it easier to fire those who don't follow the "party line." ​

The 180-Day Playbook: Roberts has overseen the creation of a secret "Fourth Pillar"—a stack of pre-written executive orders ready for a signature on Day One to bypass Congress and dismantle the Department of Education and the EPA. ​

A Hostile Environment ​

This structural overhaul doesn't exist in a vacuum; it is fueled by rhetoric that specifically targets Black identity and civic participation. Highlighting the gravity of this moment, Rachel Maddow recently noted on MSNBC: ​"The language being used now isn't just standard political fire; it is a targeted, hostile effort to frame Black political power as an inherent threat to the state. When we see the highest levels of political leadership disparaging Black voters and their history, it isn't accidental—it’s the psychological groundwork for the policy dismantling we see in documents like Project 2025." ​

The Current Frontlines: From Virginia to Louisiana ​

We don't have to look far to see this vision in action. Right now, there is a coordinated design to eliminate Black policy power through aggressive gerrymandering across the South. 

​In Louisiana: Recent battles over congressional maps demonstrate an ongoing struggle to preserve majority-Black districts against efforts to dilute the vote. ​

In Virginia and Kentucky: We see the "hellish" gerrymandering of specific zip codes, where lines are drawn to slice through communities of color, ensuring their voices are drowned out before they ever reach the ballot box. 

​The Ohio Legacy: Grant vs. The KKK ​

We must remember that the fight for constitutional protection is an Ohio legacy. It was Ohio’s own President Ulysses S. Grant who signed the KKK Act of 1871 into law. Grant understood that without federal intervention and clear legal accountability, the rights of citizens would be systematically stripped away by those who believed they were above the law. ​Grant used the power of the presidency to protect constitutional rights. Today, we see the opposite happening. While Grant worked to expand protections, the Heritage Foundation—under Roberts' leadership—is drafting a blueprint to shrink them. While we work in Ohio to uphold the spirit of the 1871 Act by ending qualified immunity, Project 2025 seeks to shield the executive from the very accountability Grant fought to establish. ​

The Vision for the Republic ​

How did we get to a point where a scholar of history is the one pulling the levers to deconstruct it? Roberts isn't just an observer; he is the mastermind "institutionalizing" a movement into a permanent administrative machine. We aren't just looking at a political document; we are looking at a vision for an imperial presidency, steered by a man who knows exactly which historical precedents he is dismantling. ​The scholar has become the architect of a new, restrictive era. It is up to us, the citizens and the truth-tellers of the "Fourth Estate," to ensure that the history of resilience we have studied is not overshadowed by a future of unchecked authority. ​


Miss Cynthia Brown is a veteran advocate, a student of media communications, and a leading voice for systemic legal reform in the State of Ohio. She is the founder of the Heartbeat Movement Inc., founder of The Ohio Coalition to End Qualified Immunity (OCEQI), and a Committee Chair of Protecting Ohioans’ Constitutional Rights. ​Learn more and join the movement: https://oceqi.org/